If self-narrative is something
that is not invented, and rather something that encodes a way of seeing, being
and knowing, then does the truth of our self really matter if it adds motivation
to the movement of change?
The fact that a Care2 user
could have never gone to a rally, volunteered, or even ever started a petition
doesn’t change the fact that (at least virtually) they ‘stood up’ and joined in
with the voice calling that ‘x’ social issue needs to be changed. Many people
on Care2 I’m sure don’t even look at their profiles, or aren’t actively
involved with the online community (like I was until a couple of weeks ago),
but does that mean that their incorrect profile details change the power of
their voice? I don’t think it does.
Chatwin states that, “Aboriginals could not believe the country
existed until they could see and sing it – just as, in the Dreamtime, the
country had not existed until the Ancestors sang it.” (Chatwin 1987,
Pg 14) This belief that Chatwin is
talking about, the idea of creating connection through songlines, can be
applied to the virtual world of Care2.
Knowing that the website’s aim is to empower, encourage and motivate
change, we can understand how it’s virtual platform can inspire and inform
those unaware of the great power of uniting and creating change as a huge
online community. Because lets face it, most people don’t think change can
happen until they see it, “Seeing is
believing” remember.
In the reading, ‘There is no ‘i’ in Network’, McNeill
states, “… suggesting close connections
between “real” and “virtual” selves, questions of what identity entails online
have implications for rethinking the limits of the human in and through
auto/biographical practices.” (McNeill 2012, Pg 102) Which raises the
notion that perhaps constructing our virtual identity motivates us to make our
physical one better. Maybe just the process of seeing other people online,
fighting for a cause, rallying for social justice, is enough encouragement for
us to join in. Engaging in online discussions about current social issues can
inspire us to get off the computer and actively do something about it.
Fighting for social justice can be
contagious, and maybe just like the Dreaming we are given “a ‘drive’ to try to ‘make sense’ out of human experience and to find
some ‘principle’ in the whole human situation” (Stanner 1953, Pg 23). That
is, by understanding the drive behind those social activist out there, reading
about their passions, being informed about their causes, understanding those
who have seen injustice, places like Care2 can begin to reinstate that
principal of justice, one petition at a time.
References
Chatwin, B. (1987). The Songlines. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd. Pg 14
James, Franke (2011). [Image] Retrieved from:
http://www.frankejames.com/images/32_care2petition564.png
McNeill, L.(2012). There Is No "I" in Network: Social Networking Sites and Posthuman Auto/Biography. Biography 35(1), 65-82. University of Hawai'i Press. Pg 102
Stanner W. E. H. (1953). White man got no dreaming: The Dreaming. Canberra, Australia: National Library of Australia. Pg 23
- Jes Meacham
Hi Jes,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed contemplating the question you asked, as to whether or not the truth of our online self as a reflection of our actual self really matters if our online self is assisting in positive-change mass movements. It made me think about how, in McNeill (2012) I had read of online social media sites as having the power to reinforce social norms (p.105). A had looked at this in a negative way, disliking the idea of being controlled in some way. However, after reading your blog I can see that this power can be put to good use as well. If a site such as Care2 can help to reinforce positive activist behavior, and a belief that change is possible, then I would applaud the power the site holds in the shaping of our virtual and real selves. Your blog has shown me the positive ways in which we can become empowered by social media sites.